Oh, I didn't expect an explanation. But the field is so foreign to me, that it was kind of like: "Oh, you have this hard problem? Just use Kenlar Blurfle, and you'll see that the obvious answer is 42". A line or two of context would've been helpful. ;^D Of course, then I wouldn't have had the fun of exploring mathworld a bit.
Two books come into my mind that explain finite geometry - both are suitable for beginners as they don't have much prerequisites:Great <sigh> now I'll have to add "Learn Hungarian" to my long list of ToDos, so I can read them! ;^)
- Hraskó András (editor), Új matematikai mozaik. TypeTEX Kiadó, Budapest, 2002.
- Reiman István, A geometria határterületei
...roboticus
In reply to Re^4: Unique Combos with Math::Combinatorics
by roboticus
in thread Unique Combos with Math::Combinatorics
by ketema
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |