Sorry, but I would have to say that the first version of the output you've posted above is impossible. It suggests that you have managed to create a hash with duplicate keys--and that is impossible!
You're going to have to post the code that you're using, along with the versions of Perl/threads/threads::shared. Nether version of the 'corrected' code I posted could ever produce that first output barring some catastrophic corruption.
In reply to Re^13: does threads (still) memleak?
by BrowserUk
in thread does threads (still) memleak?
by faxm0dem
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |