My first reply was a detailed repetition of the OP....
No, you omitted the part I specifically asked about.
Honestly you have the tendance to answer without really reading the question
Says the person who still hasn't answered my question. (x3)
But I have the strong impression you just want to repeat your usual "Perl can't be compiled to C" protocol.
I don't recall ever saying that*. In fact, the last time the subject came up, I said Perl is compiled to a list of C functions calls. Maybe you're thinking of someone else.
In any case, I definitely didn't say it here.
You usually demand to flag significant updates
You're thinking of someone else.
* — Not saying I didn't. It's obviously possible — Turing Completeness and such — but it's a question of costs and practicality, and that varies by case. Nothing "usual" about it.
Update: Added "*"
In reply to Re^7: using perlsyntax for other languages?
by ikegami
in thread using perlsyntax for other languages?
by LanX
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |