it's meaningful to say, at some level of abstraction, that address 2 contains 42 indirectly.
No. Given
$bar = 42; $foo = \$bar;
one might say "foo is 42" in some contexts. But if you remove the abstraction and start talking of addresses, the statement becomes false. There isn't a 42 at address 2.
3 is the ________ of $2
You filled in too many words. "3 is referenced by $2" or "$2 references 3".
Address (of $3)
Update: Misread.
In reply to Re: What's in a Reference?
by ikegami
in thread What's in a Reference?
by Xiong
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |