Makes sense. Except, if Parser is so much better than SAX why is Simple still using SAX as a default...
In reply to Re^4: emdash problems with XML::Simple
by nglenn
in thread emdash problems with XML::Simple
by nglenn
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |