I guess we (I mean you and I) have different understanding on what a framework is.
The best online definition I could find of a framework in this context is at http://parlab.eecs.berkeley.edu/wiki/patterns/glossary which is fairly authoratative:
Framework: A framework is a software environment organized around a software architecture that allows for programmer customizations only in harmony with the software architecture
Which mirrors the kind of crtisisms I've been levelling at them when I've said: They proscribe the entire architecture of your application; and: They prevent you from using all the tools in your toolbox.
My own definition is a simple test. Do I call them; or do they call me? The former is a library, the latter a framework. (That line can be blurred.)
I don't see any reason to argue about this. I'm trying to respect personal dislikes :)
Agreed! One man's squishy, slimey, salty yuk, is another man's caviare :)
In reply to Re^10: Your main event may be another's side-show.
by BrowserUk
in thread Your main event may be another's side-show.
by BrowserUk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |