No. The number of the month is zero based in all the localtime and timelocal APIs. Only strftime and sprintf want the number of the month adjusted.
Update: D'oh - I should've known that all the *time functions behave the same with regards to their input parameters.
In reply to Re: I have seen a bug of Time::Local module
by Corion
in thread I have seen a bug of Time::Local module
by chineseperlmonks
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |