Perl has a long-standing tradition of testing. You can always choose to ignore the test results or just disable testing when installing modules.
Out of personal experience though, I find that the tests run mostly reflect the assumptions of the programmer writing the module. So if a module test fails, this means, at least in my personal experience, that at least one assumption of the original programmer fails. I prefer an early notice of such failing assumptions over code that just fails while I try to figure out what the code does.
In reply to Re: Why is it in some other popular languages fewer steps and potential issues when installing libraries no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
by Corion
in thread Why are other popular languages very different from Perl when installing libraries, e.g. no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
by hermida
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |