Perl has a long-standing tradition of testing. You can always choose to ignore the test results or just disable testing when installing modules.
Out of personal experience though, I find that the tests run mostly reflect the assumptions of the programmer writing the module. So if a module test fails, this means, at least in my personal experience, that at least one assumption of the original programmer fails. I prefer an early notice of such failing assumptions over code that just fails while I try to figure out what the code does.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: Why is it in some other popular languages fewer steps and potential issues when installing libraries no testing needed and no compilation of C/C++ code done
by hermida (Scribe) on Apr 06, 2011 at 13:25 UTC | |
by Corion (Patriarch) on Apr 06, 2011 at 13:32 UTC | |
by Corion (Patriarch) on Apr 06, 2011 at 13:44 UTC | |