So, for goodness sake stop trying to defend your indefensible assertion that there is no difference between a constant and a write-once variable.
huh? I never said they were the same. Constants are subs that can be inlined that return a read-only variable (or something that pretends to be that), whereas read-only variables are SVs. What are you talking about? How does this even relate?
What about constant parameters and constant variables in C? All three are constructed at run-time.
What utter drivel.
How so? Did something get erased?
There is no such thing as "construction time" for a constant
What? How can you say constants aren't created? Why are you trying to prove they're created at compile-time? How does it matter?
I can't make any sense of your post. I definitely don't see how it shows that "read-only attributes" is a misnomer.
In reply to Re^8: Psychic Disconnect and Object Systems
by ikegami
in thread Psychic Disconnect and Object Systems
by John M. Dlugosz
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |