Hmm ... is it possible to $NORM-alize the list somewhat? I've not been curious enough to figure out whether there's a history of $NORM outside of jcwren's stats, but there's yer basis for a function; a node that got 50 back in the early days could possibly show up on the list, that way.
I could swear this discussion's been had before, but I was again too lazy (bad way) to do a search on it beforehand.
UPDATE props to kudra, who pointed out that previous discussion (one I even took part in), wherein she suggested normalizing the reps for the 'best of all time' list. No wonder I stole it and presented it as my own =)
perl -e 'print "How sweet does a rose smell? "; chomp ($n = <STDIN>); +$rose = "smells sweet to degree $n"; *other_name = *rose; print "$oth +er_name\n"'
In reply to Re: Revamping 'Best Nodes of All Time' List
by arturo
in thread Revamping 'Best Nodes of All Time' List
by nysus
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |