imho, the ternary (?:) operator isn't really meant to perform side effects. It was designed to select from two separate values:
$x = (1 == 1) ? 'true' : 'false'
'true' is put into $x if 1==1, and 'false' otherwise. Here's a way that does what you need, still using the ternary operator:
#!/usr/bin/perl use warnings; use strict; use List::Util qw (first); my @a = qw( 1 2 3 4 5 ); my @b = qw( 9 8 2 1 5 ); my @z; for my $elem ( @a ){ my $result = ( first { $elem == $_ } @b ) ? '+' : '-'; push @z, $result; } print @z;
Output:
++--+Edit: Changed from using alpha to using numeric as to not confuse the OP with 'eq'.
Update: Please see this post by Anomalous Monk as to why my choice of using first() from List::Util should be replaced with any() from List::MoreUtils. It's a drop-in replacement in fact.
In reply to Re: Failed array attemp
by stevieb
in thread Failed array attemp
by Anonymous Monk
| For: | Use: | ||
| & | & | ||
| < | < | ||
| > | > | ||
| [ | [ | ||
| ] | ] |