Re: Re: DBD::SQLite

My gods. I feel completely stupid. You'd think that after some 3.5 years of working with DBI nearly every day, I'd have prepare-execute-fetch down pat. *sighs*

At least I'm not the only one. *grins* Though, I am curious - why did we both miss it and only for DBD::SQLite? Did we think that it was just a toy, so the standard methods weren't necessary? :-)

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

Then there are Damian modules.... *sigh* ... that's not about being less-lazy -- that's about being on some really good drugs -- you know, there is no spoon. - flyingmoose

Comment on Re: Re: DBD::SQLite

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: DBD::SQLite by Ovid (Cardinal) on Apr 13, 2004 at 14:36 UTC
why did we both miss it and only for DBD::SQLite? I think the answer to that is simple: while this module is a gift from the database gods and I love it, that error message leaves a bit to be desired and is extremely misleading. I suspect that many people have looked at that and thought "wow, there's a bug in the C code" because that sure ain't a Perl error message. Cheers, Ovid New address of my CGI Course.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: DBD::SQLite
by Ovid (Cardinal) on Apr 13, 2004 at 14:36 UTC

why did we both miss it and only for DBD::SQLite?

I think the answer to that is simple: while this module is a gift from the database gods and I love it, that error message leaves a bit to be desired and is extremely misleading. I suspect that many people have looked at that and thought "wow, there's a bug in the C code" because that sure ain't a Perl error message.

Cheers,
Ovid

New address of my CGI Course.

[reply]