Re: Re: Translated PerlMonks FAQ (best of both?)

I'd prefer that they just work with the Brazilian(s) on making the PT translations work for both camps, similar to what we should do with any issues of the existing English faqlets being confusing to readers from non-U.S.A. English locales.

You want separate faqlets for different dialects of English?? Can't we just cite Perl's documentation policy?

Comment on Re: Re: Translated PerlMonks FAQ (best of both?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Translated PerlMonks FAQ (English?) by tye (Sage) on Apr 20, 2004 at 01:10 UTC
You must be reading it as Australian English. I was writing it in US English. In US English, "I'd prefer that they just work [...] on making the PT translations work for both camps" means that I don't want separate translations. Otherwise I'd be advocating "pt_BR" not "just PT". - tye	[reply]
Re: Re^3: Translated PerlMonks FAQ (English?) by ysth (Canon) on Apr 20, 2004 at 02:07 UTC
Yes, my understanding was upside down (but I would attribute the quality of upside downness to the US more than Australia).	[reply]