in reply to Re: New functions?
in thread New functions?

More likely it's an overzealous attempt at obfuscating email addresses in a web mail archive.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: New functions?
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 02, 2004 at 06:13 UTC
    Then it must probably be some "automated obfuscator" as the "@" here is not used in e-mail addresses and the s/@/ <at> / was blindly applied.

    Surely another victim of the anti-spam overkill. Sometimes you wonder whether the cure is worse than the illness.

    CountZero

    "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom