I think this could work but I'm not having much joy
so far. I'm still on perl version 5.6.1 which could
easily be a factor.
Will an lvalue sub work when called as &ret = 123?
I ask because I'm trying to do parameter preprocessing
for the caller and was doing it with &ret.
| [reply] |
I'm not sure if lvaluable subs work in 5.6.1. This code works for me with Perl 5.8.4:
sub ret :lvalue { $_[0] }
sub foo {
&ret++;
print "ARGS: <@_>\n";
}
my ($x, $y) = (10, 20);
foo($x, $y);
__END__
ARGS: <11 20>
Make sure you aren't accidentally shifting the argument you're planning on setting before you set it.
_____________________________________________________
Jeff [japhy]Pinyan:
Perl,
regex,
and perl
hacker, who'd like a job (NYC-area)
s++=END;++y(;-P)}y js++=;shajsj<++y(p-q)}?print:??;
| [reply] [d/l] |
Got your results with 5.6.1, must be my sketchy understanding
at fault.
Aha, it was my testing code messing up, reassigning during
the middle of the test. Thanks
update: I may have spoken too soon...
| [reply] |