in reply to Re: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware
in thread PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.
  • Comment on Re^2: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware
by davidj (Priest) on Jul 31, 2004 at 21:50 UTC
    I'd rather not pay

    Why not? According to you, software that doesn't cost anything is crap (at least, that is your implication). So why would you intentionally avoid quality software and opt for crap?

    davidj

    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware
by OhReally (Monk) on Jul 31, 2004 at 22:27 UTC
    What "bad stuff" did you hear about xemacs?
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware
by husker (Chaplain) on Aug 02, 2004 at 14:40 UTC
    vim is ++. It has some built-in Perl helpers, and some others have been contributed by users.

    And it installed quite readily. :)