Re^2: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by davidj (Priest) on Jul 31, 2004 at 21:50 UTC
I'd rather not pay Why not? According to you, software that doesn't cost anything is crap (at least, that is your implication). So why would you intentionally avoid quality software and opt for crap? davidj	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by OhReally (Monk) on Jul 31, 2004 at 22:27 UTC
What "bad stuff" did you hear about xemacs?	[reply]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.
Re^3: PostgreSQL, Emacs, and other groupieware by husker (Chaplain) on Aug 02, 2004 at 14:40 UTC
vim is ++. It has some built-in Perl helpers, and some others have been contributed by users. And it installed quite readily. :)	[reply]