in reply to A cleaner way of scoping variables
Two examples that eliminate the need for $bar entirely.
my $foo = 1; print +($foo)? "True" : "";
Or, if it's more involved than that...
my $foo = 1; print do{ if( $foo ) { "True" } }
In your last example, you asserted that it would be nice if $bar were accessible outside of the if(){} block. But you previously stated that you didn't want to use a global variable (in this case what you really meant was a lexical scoped to package level). The problem is that if $bar is accessible outside of the if(){} block, it's no different from a package-scoped lexical. You don't want your lexicals leaking outside of the block they're defined in; that defeats the purpose of a lexical variable.
Dave
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^2: A cleaner way of scoping variables
by bradcathey (Prior) on Aug 09, 2004 at 17:06 UTC |