in reply to Re^2: submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used
in thread submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used

No, I said the description implies reading site_perl; which seems like a good feature to add since it's not there; the POD then clarifies that this not the case.

--
I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

  • Comment on Re^3: submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used
by diotalevi (Canon) on Aug 24, 2004 at 00:37 UTC

    I'm confused. The POD is a copy of the description. I wrote it once, made a copy and altered the markup from POD to HTML. What part of the description implies it reads site_perl?

    I don't know of any good way to do this other than oh... parse all the perl in site_perl and use pause-like techniques to find the packages. Yeah, ok. Maybe I do know how to do this. Neat feature suggestion!

[reply]
      submit-cpan-ratings is a script which automates the process of finding the modules you've used in your code
      I read an implied "ever", as in not in specific code, but modules that you've used (and are therefore in site_perl)

      If you submit this to CPAN (presumably to cpan scripts) I'd recommend PARing in the modules.

      What's to parse? You can File::Find to walk the tree no? Then use existing &get_installed_module_version.

      --
      I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

[reply]
        I wouldn't know what the module's package is without looking at the package declaration.
[reply]
        If you submit this to CPAN (presumably to cpan scripts) I'd recommend PARing in the modules.

        Huh?

[reply]

In Section Code Catacombs