in reply to Re^3: submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used
in thread submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used

I'm confused. The POD is a copy of the description. I wrote it once, made a copy and altered the markup from POD to HTML. What part of the description implies it reads site_perl?

I don't know of any good way to do this other than oh... parse all the perl in site_perl and use pause-like techniques to find the packages. Yeah, ok. Maybe I do know how to do this. Neat feature suggestion!

  • Comment on Re^4: submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: submit-cpan-ratings - upload ratings to CPAN for stuff you've used
by belg4mit (Prior) on Aug 24, 2004 at 01:00 UTC
    submit-cpan-ratings is a script which automates the process of finding the modules you've used in your code
    I read an implied "ever", as in not in specific code, but modules that you've used (and are therefore in site_perl)

    If you submit this to CPAN (presumably to cpan scripts) I'd recommend PARing in the modules.

    What's to parse? You can File::Find to walk the tree no? Then use existing &get_installed_module_version.

    --
    I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

[reply]
      I wouldn't know what the module's package is without looking at the package declaration.
[reply]
        True, but it seems to be rare that a module's interface namespace is different from where it lies in the tree so you try to load and fetch version from that before parsing for package. Parsing for package is also uncool because you can have many, which is the one true? If you're lucky all will fall under one e.g; package Foo; package Foo:Bar; package Foo:Quux

        --
        I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

[reply]
[d/l]
      If you submit this to CPAN (presumably to cpan scripts) I'd recommend PARing in the modules.

      Huh?

[reply]

In Section Code Catacombs