Re^5: Better name and description for this section (replying)

No, the problem is in ~~newlistapproved~~ ~~listapproved settings~~ embed node with vote container, not your code -- and I should have fixed it when I fixed shownote.

OTOH, you're wrong about what missing from reply settings means -- it means not-replyable. More speicificly: the entry replyTypes is a comma-sepperated list of nodetype names that replies to should be notes. The other entries should have keys of nodetype names that are replyable, and values of the nodetype that replying to them creates. Note that there is no optional whitespace before or after those commas.

Hm, now we need to make super-search know about this section.

Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).

Comment on Re^5: Better name and description for this section (replying)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Better name and description for this section (replying) by de-merphq (Beadle) on Sep 12, 2004 at 11:45 UTC
OTOH, you're wrong about Maybe i misremember but im pretty sure I hacked exactly this behaviour in to deal with pmdevnote. Possibly it wasnt the correct thing to do, and also possibly I misremember. --- alter ego of demerphq	[reply]
Re^6: Better name and description for this section (replying) by de-merphq (Beadle) on Sep 12, 2004 at 12:37 UTC
Reviewed your other patches and i see what was happening now. Sorry for the confusion. --- alter ego of demerphq	[reply]