to use RSS-compliant XML would be trivial!
What does RSS compliant XML look like then? We already have facilities for producing different XML styles for the tickers so extending it shouldn't be difficult. Assuming RSS-compliant XML is not too different from what we currently have.
---
demerphq
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
-- Gandhi
Flux8
| [reply] [d/l] |
I think RSS-formatted ticker feeds would differ from their current format(s) only syntactically. Semantically, the XML tickers re-invent the RSS wheel (in part; RSS is a (semantic) superset of the XML tickers).
I'd recommend conforming to RSS 2.0, because it's (allegedly) backward-compatible with 0.92, which is in turn backward-compatible with 0.91... And 0.91/0.92 are the de facto standards for RSS.
Here's a good article by perl monger Jonathan Eisenzopf: Making Headlines with RSS.
I haven't checked it out, but there is a XML::RSS module which supposedly makes RSS generation easier.
btw - If you're seriously considering this proposal, you might also be interested in another, "better" standard for syndication, the Atom protocol. Some blog sites, such as LiveJournal, support Atom, and it may supplant RSS as the de facto standard for syndication.
| [reply] |
| [reply] |