in reply to Re^3: Todo list should additional levels be added (--once and for all)
in thread Todo list should additional levels be added
Ah, ok let me clarify myself here. The proposed changes I have in mind would still benefit from your patch. My comment was purely on a conceptual/design level. Since isApproved rules will still have to call getLevel() (but through a clean interface) enhancements to getLevel are probably required. All my point was that instead of being hasty and just cutting the new levels in lets be slower and more methodical and get to a better solution. I mean we can wait a while before adding the new levels right?
Anyway :-)
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
-- Gandhi
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^5: Todo list should additional levels be added (once and for all)
by ysth (Canon) on Oct 28, 2004 at 08:34 UTC | |
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Oct 28, 2004 at 08:38 UTC |