Perl allows you to call a method on an object or class by
way of indirection -- storing the method name in a scalar:
my $foo = Obj->new;
for (qw( create init add )) {
$foo->$_(); # note -- $foo->$_ will not work, ()'s needed
}
However, this is very different from a qualified name. A
qualified name is basically "This::That::Those".
They can only contain valid identifiers, which are strings
that match /\A(?:[a-zA-Z_]\w*|\d*)\z/ (yes, you can
have an identifier of 0 characters).
To get the behavior you'd like, I suggest using the symbol
table:
my $meth = 'meth';
$A::B::{$meth}->(25);
# %A::B:: is a symbol table
# $A::B::{$meth} holds the typeglob *A::B::meth
# *A::B::meth->(...) is like A::B::meth(...)
Aside: here's an example of 0-length identifiers that
you can use under strict (because they're qualified):
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
@:: = qw( this program uses empty variable names );
for $:: (@::) { print $::; } # ::; looks confusing ;)
open ::, ".cshrc";
print scalar <::>; # is there no end to this madness?
close ::;
Just avoid screwing with %::, since that's a symbol
table.
$_="goto+F.print+chop;\n=yhpaj";F1:eval | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
package A::B;
sub meth {
warn "meth $_[0]", "\n";
}
my $meth='meth';
A::B->$meth(25); # succeeds...not really what you are likely expecting
&$meth(26); # succeeds in calling
my $foo="A::B::meth";
&$foo(27); # also succeeds
outputs
meth A::B
meth 26
meth 27
I'd rather leave it up to more elequent monks seeking high xp to explain this one.
(better to remain silent and be thought an idiot that to speak and remove all doubt) :-)
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
"Methods" normally act on an object, which passes the object reference as the first argument. Methods can also act on packages (using a similar notation), passing the name of the package as the first argument. The key difference is in how you want to interpret the subroutine. Do you need it to be a simple subroutine (without care as to the object/package context), or do you need it to be a method, with knowledge of the object or package? If you need it to be a simple subroutine, write it as such and either export it, or call it as A::B::sub($arg1, $arg2). If you need it to be a method, that's when you use the arrow notation.
package A::B;
sub new {
my $caller = shift;
my $self = {};
bless $self, ref($caller) || $caller;
}
sub method {
my $self = shift;
my @args = @_;
print "self=$self, args=@args\n";
}
sub function {
my @args = @_;
print "args=@args\n";
}
package main;
$self = new A::B; # A::B::new as a package method,
# first arg = "A::B";
$self = A::B->new; # A::B::new as a package method,
# first arg = "A::B";
$self = $self->new; # A::B::new as an *object* method,
# first arg = $self, ref($self) = "A::B"
&A::B::function("some", "args"); # don't care about $self or A::B
$self->method("some", "args"); # Need to know $self
&A::B::method($self, "some", "args"); # Same results, weird methodolog
+y
A::B->method("some", "args"); # Need to know name of package
Typically package methods are only useful when creating a new object that might rely on inheritance. If you create a descendent object, and simply want to inherit the parent's "new" constructor, simply using bless without a second argument will cause the new object to be blessed into the parent class. Providing that first argument to the 'new' method and passing it as the second argument to bless causes it to be blessed into the class that your code originally used. Similarly, using ref as above allows you to create new objects via a pre-existing object ($self->new).
Other than that, the only reason you might want to use a package method is for readability. | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
It works because it's a soft reference. You shouldn't use
soft references except in ONE specific application (importing
symbols from one package to another.
$_="goto+F.print+chop;\n=yhpaj";F1:eval
| [reply] |
my $coderef = A::B->can($meth);
...
$coderef->("A::B", 25);
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker | [reply] [d/l] |
Hello,
I have a similar problem.
I want to call a class method of a "dynamic" class "dynamically", i.e. I want to make a call like
my $result = MODULES::$submodule::$method ($data);
I tried different things like
my $request = "MODULES::$submodule::$method";
my $result = &$request ($data);
or
my $result = eval "$request ($data)";
but I didn't succeed. The even worst thing is that the program keeps on running without any error, only the method trying to call another method seems to "die" without any hint.
Actually this problem is common to my current project. Does anybody have a clue about that?
Thanks.
Marco | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
If it's a static method then you could do this
my $result = "MODULES::$submodule"->can($method)->($data);
This works because can is returning a reference to the subroutine in MODULES::$submodule and then that it is being called with $data being passed in.
Or, simpler still, if it's a class method then you don't need any trickery
my $result = "MODULES::$submodule"->$method($data);
That just uses the string "MODULES::$submodule" as the class and then calls the method as designated by $method.
HTH
_________ broquaint | [reply] [d/l] [select] |
my $result = "MODULES::$submodule->$method($data)"
| [reply] [d/l] |