Re^2: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors

Good ideas, thanks.

I like more control than a wiki would do. I ran 2 wikis and had to shut done both due to exessive spamming and lack of community. Of course it proves more that I was not good at initiating them and maintaining them than they are not good.

I though of finding people who would volunteer to maintain the subforum of one distro. This would include taking care that the discussion is clean (no spammers and other bad ppl) and build some kind of a home pages for the module. Linking to other sites, emphasizing nodes etc.

BTW allowing links is in the work, I just wanted to get the site off the ground (or my HD) so to get feedback soon but knowing the real work only starts now....

Comment on Re^2: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors by gaal (Parson) on Feb 05, 2005 at 11:16 UTC
To reduce comment spam, forums like PM and yours should consider using nofollow.	[reply]
(OT) nofollow considered harmful (was: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors) by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Feb 05, 2005 at 19:51 UTC
No, they shouldn't. It doesn't prevent spamming in any sense of the word. It won't until every last site on the planet which accepts third-party content uses it — and considering the nature of email spam, not even then. `rel="nofollow"` was invented by Google and doesn't solve anyone's problems other than the Googlebot's. Surprise, surprise. Instead, using the facility unilaterally means you put your legitimate users on a level with Texas hold'em spammers and viagra pitchers. Further reading: Let no fellow nofollow, lest we all lie fallow Is rel = "nofollow" really as !important as that? We didn't start the nofollow Which way do the threads on the nofollow screw turn? Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re: (OT) nofollow considered harmful (was: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors) by gaal (Parson) on Feb 05, 2005 at 20:25 UTC
No, it doesn't. Your legitimate users log in, and you trust their links. The jitter you've linked to is from bloggers, who care about their own ranking but don't usually offer their visitors a login. Their inbound links (and thus, rankings) typically come from reciprocating comments on other blogs which don't have logins either, which is why they're worried.	[reply]
Re^2: (OT) nofollow considered harmful by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Feb 05, 2005 at 20:37 UTC
Re^3: (OT) nofollow considered harmful (was: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors) by gaal (Parson) on Feb 05, 2005 at 21:07 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
Re^4: CPAN::Forum opens its virtual doors by theorbtwo (Prior) on Feb 19, 2005 at 09:28 UTC
I've considered doing nofollow on PM -- specificly, for links made by anonymonk, and users with only a few XP. (Links made by users would loose their nofollow if the user gained XP.) Just because it hasn't been implemented yet doesn't mean that nobody is considering it. While comment spam is low on PM, it is decidedly nonzero. As for the naysayers here, I've considered your argument, and think it's bunk. 1) I know Evan, who invented it, and trust him. 2) Even if it doesn't help us much, it doesn't hurt us, and does hurt comment spammers. 3) Email spam and comment spam are very different things, and shouldn't be considered the same. 4) It doesn't hurt legitimate users of the site; legitimate users get accounts and gain level 2 fairly quickly... and even if all external links were marked nofollow, I still don't think that really hurts anyone, with the possible exception of the people being linked to. Warning: Unless otherwise stated, code is untested. Do not use without understanding. Code is posted in the hopes it is useful, but without warranty. All copyrights are relinquished into the public domain unless otherwise stated. I am not an angel. I am capable of error, and err on a fairly regular basis. If I made a mistake, please let me know (such as by replying to this node).	[reply]