in reply to RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags

Looks like it could be useful, if you're into that sort of thing. Any name that does not match that dumb word m/folk/i is fine with me. If someone likes the term, they can add their own "tag" to refer to it that way.

--
[ e d @ h a l l e y . c c ]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC: Data::Taxonomy::Tags
by The Mad Hatter (Priest) on Jun 22, 2005 at 16:26 UTC
    I agree the term "folksonomy" is really a bit silly, but rest assured, I don't plan on including it in the name of the module. ; )
[reply]

In Section Meditations