in reply to Re^3: Compiling Tk under Windows
in thread Compiling Tk under Windows

I suggest that you contact the tester ('barbie(at)missbarbell.co.uk') and ask her how she did it and whether perhaps she still has the compiled version.
Please don't, that's not the reason cpan-testers sign up and test and report on distributions.
I would be surprised if a mingw environment was specially set-up for this module (but of course you never know until you ask).
You do if you read the report. http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.cpan.testers/129360
... Compiler:
cc='cl', ccflags ='-nologo

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Compiling Tk under Windows
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jun 30, 2005 at 06:13 UTC
    Is cl the mingw C-compiler? I didn't know. If so, I stand corrected.

    Comes from being compiler challenged on a corporate laptop without admin privileges to install all kinds of goodies.

    CountZero

    "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

      (heh, I didn't actually say it but) No, cl is the microsoft compiler. The MinGW compiler is gcc.

      MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
      I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
      ** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

        So it did actually compile under "standard" Windows (notwithstanding the author's comments that it needs mingw).

        CountZero

        "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law