Re: Simulating the absence of a module

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Simulating the absence of a module by adrianh (Chancellor) on Jul 04, 2005 at 17:50 UTC
I think Test::MockObject is what you're looking for. ~~Nope. T::MO is about faking existing packages, not pretending a package doesn't exist.~~	[reply]
Re^3: Simulating the absence of a module by Mutant (Priest) on Jul 05, 2005 at 08:13 UTC
You can use it for that purpose though. See the tutorial on perl.com.	[reply]
Re^4: Simulating the absence of a module by adrianh (Chancellor) on Jul 05, 2005 at 11:23 UTC
You can use it for that purpose though. See the tutorial on perl.com. ++. You're right - my apologies. For those who've not come across this way of using T::MO before: `my $mock = Test::MockObject->new(); $mock->fake_module('Foo::Bar' => ( 'import' => sub { die "Foo::Bar could not be loaded" } )); use_ok('Foo::Bar');` [download]	[reply] [d/l]