in reply to Re: Simulating the absence of a module
in thread Simulating the absence of a module
I think Test::MockObject is what you're looking for.
Nope. T::MO is about faking existing packages, not pretending a package doesn't exist.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^3: Simulating the absence of a module
by Mutant (Priest) on Jul 05, 2005 at 08:13 UTC | |
by adrianh (Chancellor) on Jul 05, 2005 at 11:23 UTC |