in reply to cpan statistics

Of course, the problem here is that each module gets one vote per download, regardless of actual usage. For example, I've installed dozens of modules merely as an excersise to help someone on perlmonks, never to use them again. Other modules are used on a day-to-day basis. Which one counts more in automatic statistics? Neither. Which one should?

Statistics are fine. As long as you understand what they're telling you. And that is extremely difficult to do, even for trained staticians.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: cpan statistics
by pg (Canon) on Aug 26, 2005 at 16:32 UTC

    Add one more thing: this type of statistics would not be fair to those modules bundled with ActiveState etc. Less people will download those modules, but they were bundled as they were perceived to be useful.