Re^3: Super Nibbles

Indeed I did loose the main loop. The speed is realy that fast? Its just perfect on mine. Must be something about the timing in Tk::After....guess i'll go read some documentation. Thanks for the feed back. BTW did the first version work better speed wise?

___________
Eric Hodges $_='y==QAe=e?y==QG@>@?iy==QVq?f?=a@iG?=QQ=Q?9'; s/(.)/ord($1)-50/eigs;tr/6123457/- \/|\\\_\n/;print;

Comment on Re^3: Super Nibbles

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Super Nibbles by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 15, 2005 at 00:47 UTC
I didn't try the first version, but this one is quite playable until you get the speed boost at which point, if you are heading towards a nearby edge, your dead. If your lucky enough to be close to an edge and facing the other way, you might survive if your tail isn't too long, but should you hit a second speed boost whilst the first is in effect, there is just a red blur and it's all over. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^4: Super Nibbles
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Nov 15, 2005 at 00:47 UTC

I didn't try the first version, but this one is quite playable until you get the speed boost at which point, if you are heading towards a nearby edge, your dead.

If your lucky enough to be close to an edge and facing the other way, you might survive if your tail isn't too long, but should you hit a second speed boost whilst the first is in effect, there is just a red blur and it's all over.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

[reply]