in reply to Re: CGI.pm not seeing params in URL?
in thread CGI.pm not seeing params in URL?

There is no way to have them taken into consideration implicitly...
<nit type="pedantic">
There is, although it's not a good idea. Look in the source of CGI.pm for the comment
# Some people want to have their cake and eat it too!
and uncomment the lines below it....
</nit>

Update
The word "implicitly" just sank in. Nevermind....

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: CGI.pm not seeing params in URL?
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Nov 15, 2005 at 19:00 UTC

    Okay, I didn’t know that; but considering that any module can be made to do anything if you patch it, I don’t regard that as pertinent. I certainly wouldn’t want to rely on a feature in a patched module – what if I copy the script to another machine? What if I need to upgrade the module?

    Makeshifts last the longest.