in reply to Re^4: Regex: Matching around a word(s)
in thread Regex: Matching around a word(s)
Okay, this will amalgamate two matches closely adjacent matches:
#! perl -slw use strict; my $word = $ARGV[0] or die "No search term"; ( my $text = do{ local $/; <DATA> } ) =~ tr[\n][]d; $text =~ s[ ( (?: \S+ \s+ ){1,3} ) ( $word ) [[:punct:]]* (?= ( (?: (?: \s+ \S+ ){0,6} \s+ ( $word ) [[:punct:]]* (?: \s+ \S+ ){1,3} ) | (?: \s+ \S+ ){1,3} ) ) ][ my $extract = "$1<$2>$3"; $extract =~ s[\s($word)][ <$1>]g; print $extract; ]gex; __END__ Regular expressions have always been a weak spot for me, and I've got +a question that's got me stumped. Here's the problem I'm trying to solv +e. I have somwhat large articles of text (returned from a search), what +I'd like to do is capture the word and X number of words before and after + it while tagging the matching word in the captured text. My inital thoug +ht was to try something like this. The problem I have is that if there i +s more than one term and they overlap, the nth term will not be annotat +ed. So my next thought is lookahead/lookbehind, but they don't capture. Is there a way to do this with a single regex? Is a regex even the be +st way to do this? Thanks, -Lee
A test
P:\test>517393 and spot for me, <and> I've got a capture the word <and> X number of words before <and> after it while of words before <and> after it while than one term <and> they overlap, the
As is, it won't try for a third or fourth, (and is currently repeating itself!), but it should be possible to do that using a independant subregex ((?{ $regex ))), I just haven't got it right yet. I'll have another go tomorrow when my eyes are open :)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^6: Regex: Matching around a word(s)
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Dec 17, 2005 at 03:10 UTC | |
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Dec 17, 2005 at 13:04 UTC | |
by shotgunefx (Parson) on Dec 18, 2005 at 00:34 UTC |