Re^2: Another day, another nit

... a style guide that has been defined and agreed upon

Binding on O'Reilly authors, perhaps, but not on PerlMonks.

Comment on Re^2: Another day, another nit

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Another day, another nit by merlyn (Sage) on Dec 20, 2005 at 17:26 UTC
Uh, what part of what I said would disagree with that? Not sure why you're trying to make a point here. Sure, it's an O'Reilly standard. But I'm free to suggest to you that you also use the same standard here. You're free to reject it. What's your point? -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply]
Re^4: Another day, another nit by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 20, 2005 at 17:37 UTC
Just making the point for the sake of making it. For posterity, let's say. I appreciate the factual information you provided.	[reply]