in reply to Re^2: Another day, another nit
in thread Another day, another nit

Uh, what part of what I said would disagree with that? Not sure why you're trying to make a point here.

Sure, it's an O'Reilly standard. But I'm free to suggest to you that you also use the same standard here. You're free to reject it. What's your point?

-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Another day, another nit
by jdporter (Paladin) on Dec 20, 2005 at 17:37 UTC

    Just making the point for the sake of making it. For posterity, let's say. I appreciate the factual information you provided.

[reply]

In Section Meditations