Anybody tried the TMojo content generation (was: content management) system?

davebaker has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

I can't find much info about the TMojo Perl content generation (was: content management) system (including doing a Super Search here), but it looks nicely documented. Anybody tried using it?

--Dave Baker (no relation to the software authors)

Comment on Anybody tried the TMojo content generation (was: content management) system?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system? by donarb (Beadle) on Dec 24, 2005 at 20:00 UTC
Yes, it its nicely documented, but it looks like just another HTML template library (almost like Mason, but with '<: :>' tags instead), not a content management system. When you said content management, I'm thinking Krang or Bricolage. This is nowhere close. The tag line on the page claims "Content Generation". That I might agree with.	[reply]
Re^2: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system? by astroboy (Chaplain) on Dec 24, 2005 at 22:01 UTC
Krang and Bricolage are nice, but they have a huge learning curve and are more feature-rich than many people need	[reply]
Re^3: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system? by donarb (Beadle) on Dec 25, 2005 at 00:19 UTC
My point is that TMojo is merely a template system, like HTML::Mason or HTML::Template, in fact, its module name (HTML::TMojo) places it into the html generation namespace. It is not a content management system, like Krang or Bricolage. There are no facilities for template editing-storage-retrieval, or multi-user collaboration workflows. Yes Krang or Bricolage are complex, but a content management system handles many more things than just content generation, therefore, the title of this node is imprecise.	[reply]