Re: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system?

Yes, it its nicely documented, but it looks like just another HTML template library (almost like Mason, but with '<: :>' tags instead), not a content management system. When you said content management, I'm thinking Krang or Bricolage. This is nowhere close.

The tag line on the page claims "Content Generation". That I might agree with.

Comment on Re: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system? by astroboy (Chaplain) on Dec 24, 2005 at 22:01 UTC
Krang and Bricolage are nice, but they have a huge learning curve and are more feature-rich than many people need	[reply]
Re^3: Anybody tried the TMojo content mgt system? by donarb (Beadle) on Dec 25, 2005 at 00:19 UTC
My point is that TMojo is merely a template system, like HTML::Mason or HTML::Template, in fact, its module name (HTML::TMojo) places it into the html generation namespace. It is not a content management system, like Krang or Bricolage. There are no facilities for template editing-storage-retrieval, or multi-user collaboration workflows. Yes Krang or Bricolage are complex, but a content management system handles many more things than just content generation, therefore, the title of this node is imprecise.	[reply]