Re^4: Composing or chaining subroutines

In theory, I'm the maintainer of B::Generate and I was unaware of your issues. I couldn't have solved them because I don't have a Windows computer and don't have PodMaster's experience with MSVC. At least the note would have been there in rt.cpan.org and I would have known that something was up. I didn't know there was a problem at all til I happened to notice your note here. You should always file a bug report if only so other people can see it.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

Comment on Re^4: Composing or chaining subroutines

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Composing or chaining subroutines by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 16, 2006 at 20:47 UTC
It would seem to me that the information is already available. Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^6: Composing or chaining subroutines by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 16, 2006 at 20:56 UTC
I'm not an ActiveState user and had no idea that page existed. ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊	[reply]
Re^7: Composing or chaining subroutines by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 16, 2006 at 21:00 UTC
I assumed that failure detected by the AS automated build process would automatically generate a bug report to the failing packages. Seems not. Okay let me put it another way. Do you have any interest in working with me to solve this problem? Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal? "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply] [d/l]