in reply to Re^2: Composing or chaining subroutines
in thread Composing or chaining subroutines

True. That was remiss of me.

I think that given the lack of informed response I got from my question here, combined with the either totally absence of any response; condecending "you don't know what your doing, so I'm just gonna quietly close this bug report as 'user error'"; or outright hostile rants; I've received in the past, I guess I couldn't face the hassle.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
  • Comment on Re^3: Composing or chaining subroutines

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Composing or chaining subroutines
by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 16, 2006 at 20:38 UTC

    In theory, I'm the maintainer of B::Generate and I was unaware of your issues. I couldn't have solved them because I don't have a Windows computer and don't have PodMaster's experience with MSVC. At least the note would have been there in rt.cpan.org and I would have known that something was up. I didn't know there was a problem at all til I happened to notice your note here. You should always file a bug report if only so other people can see it.

    ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

[reply]

      It would seem to me that the information is already available.

      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]

        I'm not an ActiveState user and had no idea that page existed.

        ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom