in reply to Re: Composing or chaining subroutines
in thread Composing or chaining subroutines

You never submitted a bug report about it not compiling.

⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

  • Comment on Re^2: Composing or chaining subroutines

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Composing or chaining subroutines
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 16, 2006 at 19:33 UTC

    True. That was remiss of me.

    I think that given the lack of informed response I got from my question here, combined with the either totally absence of any response; condecending "you don't know what your doing, so I'm just gonna quietly close this bug report as 'user error'"; or outright hostile rants; I've received in the past, I guess I couldn't face the hassle.


    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

      In theory, I'm the maintainer of B::Generate and I was unaware of your issues. I couldn't have solved them because I don't have a Windows computer and don't have PodMaster's experience with MSVC. At least the note would have been there in rt.cpan.org and I would have known that something was up. I didn't know there was a problem at all til I happened to notice your note here. You should always file a bug report if only so other people can see it.

      ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

        It would seem to me that the information is already available.


        Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
        Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
        "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
        In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.