To clarify, I wasn't complaining about anonymous postings in general, just about this specific post. Even without reading the links you give I can think of several valid reasons why one would want to post as AM and I'm fine with that (my previous suggestion for changing one aspect of AM posting notwithstanding). But in this particular case it is clear that this was a Monk who was in the CB yesterday and who is commenting on Intrepid's character without having the decency of identifying himself. Regardless of the accuracy of his statements, that is sniping and I personally don't approve of that (not that anyone needs my approval, just giving my opinion).
| [reply] [d/l] |
I have to say the same as Anonymonk already did: the chatterbox is visible to all, so it’s entirely conceivable that someone who has no account could have been watching this episode and could know every detail of it. What would make you think otherwise?
Makeshifts last the longest.
| [reply] |
But in this particular case it is clear that this was a Monk who was in the CB yesterday and who is commenting on Intrepid's character without having the decency of identifying himself.
I am Anonymous Monk. I've been visiting for about a year and I don't have an account.
| [reply] |