in reply to Re^6: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell
in thread Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell

Well, I'd have to drop $30 to read it, but I think I understand what it's doing. I actually use my Sepia for perl-with-completion, so I'll look at putting something similar in that. I've remved the dependency on EPL in my local copy, and just need to gather the tuits to make a release...
  • Comment on Re^7: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^8: Professional Toolkits <=> vim + shell
by diotalevi (Canon) on Apr 14, 2006 at 04:13 UTC

    Shoooot. Does your module work well? There might still be a chance to mention your module in a footnote. There's something there but it could use an xref to your module..

    ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊

      It's a bit wonky in places, as I haven't been doing much perl development of late, but the interactive prompt and completion work reasonably well. I've got some time today, so I'll try to get a new version tested and out on CPAN.

        Further, it looks like your deps, Emacs::EPL doesn't pass tests and Module::Info is missing from CPAN.

        ⠤⠤ ⠙⠊⠕⠞⠁⠇⠑⠧⠊