That was my understanding too. For my own benefit, I would like to see a worked example of using Thread::Pool.
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
Lingua non convalesco, consenesco et abolesco. -- Rule 1 has a caveat! -- Who broke the cabal?
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
After scrolling back up to the original post (thinking along the way, "Hmm, BrowserUk's usually on the ball. I wonder how he missed the original sample code"), I realized I'd misread the pseudocode's "Pool::Of::Threads" as Thread::Pool.
My bad. :-)
| [reply] |