in reply to Re^13: Perl 6 Module manager
in thread Perl 6 Module manager
It fits well with e.g. extensions to C/C++ compilers. Few would use vendor specific extensions (outside Windows) today for those languages, ...
gcc supports quite a few extensions to the latest C99, and they do get used. I've encountered the ternary operator used as an lvalue in a couple of perl modules, and computed-goto is used by one flavour of Parrot runloop. The C++ practice of intermingling declarations and statements, and declaring for loop variables inline was very wide spread long before they were finally adopted by the C99 revision.
Indeed, without you applying --ansi --pedantic, gcc accepts these and a bunch of other extensions without warning. I have several versions of MS VC and VC++ compiler, and none of them accept extensions without explicitly enabling them as far as I am aware.
I guess my point is that it's too easy and very common to embue MS with "evil intent", as opposed to "over-exploitation of a dominant market position". It's also easy for the younger generations to loose sight of the fact that history is just repeating itself. Google for AT&T "baby bells" 1984 and further back IBM antitrust 1972".
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re^15: Perl 6 Module manager
by BerntB (Deacon) on Apr 24, 2006 at 01:59 UTC |