Anonymous Monk has asked for the wisdom of the Perl Monks concerning the following question:

This node falls below the community's minimum standard of quality and will not be displayed.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: CGI.pm
by OeufMayo (Curate) on Feb 16, 2001 at 14:41 UTC

    My best advice would be to put use CGI; at the beginning of your script.

    More seriously, could you please explain why do you want to re-write a module which has proven itself to be stable, bug-free, reliable?

    You may also want to look at Ovid's most excellent node dealing with the subject: use CGI or die;

    <kbd>--
    PerlMonger::Paris(http => 'paris.pm.org');</kbd>
Re: CGI.pm
by mirod (Canon) on Feb 16, 2001 at 14:46 UTC
Re: CGI.pm
by eg (Friar) on Feb 16, 2001 at 14:54 UTC

    I agree completely with Mssrs. mirod and OeufMayo. If you're doing any sort of real CGI work, use CGI.pm. In fact I think it's bordering on being professionally unethical to not use CGI.pm (or CGI::Lite) on a perl cgi job.

    That said, if you're trying to re-write CGI.pm for your own education/amusement, there is no better source to see how things are done than looking at the source for ... CGI.pm!