(jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT...

maybe it's just me, but, rather than go for the complexity for the sake of testing, I always just do something stupid like use regular print's until i get the results I want and add the MAILPIPE stuff later. Why build a jet when all you need is a car?

"A man's maturity -- consists in having found again the
seriousness one had as a child, at play."   --Nietzsche
[download]

Comment on (jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT... Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT... by thor (Priest) on Feb 20, 2001 at 01:11 UTC
Normally, I would as well. Except that when I first started the project, I knew that there would be a LOT of them. I figured that it would be easier to write them all in from the start, and then just change one line, rather than many. thor	[reply]
(jptxs): Re: (jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT... by jptxs (Curate) on Feb 20, 2001 at 01:13 UTC
yeah, I guess `MAILPIPE = STDOUT` is easy enough to do. I just get off on global replaces in vi, I guess =) `"A man's maturity -- consists in having found again the seriousness one had as a child, at play." --Nietzsche` [download]	[reply] [d/l] [select]