in reply to (jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT...
in thread Changing the name of STDOUT...

Normally, I would as well. Except that when I first started the project, I knew that there would be a LOT of them. I figured that it would be easier to write them all in from the start, and then just change one line, rather than many. thor
  • Comment on Re: (jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(jptxs): Re: (jptxs) Re: Changing the name of STDOUT...
by jptxs (Curate) on Feb 20, 2001 at 01:13 UTC
    yeah, I guess *MAILPIPE = *STDOUT is easy enough to do. I just get off on global replaces in vi, I guess =) 
    "A man's maturity -- consists in having found again the
seriousness one had as a child, at play."   --Nietzsche

    [download]
[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom