Re: [Inconsequential] Strawberry Perl and MM_Win32.pm
by xdg (Monsignor) on Jan 20, 2007 at 15:50 UTC
|
For the most part, any modules that are bundled with Strawberry from CPAN as opposed to the core Perl source are put in site/lib. (E.g. a more up-to-date version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker.) The exceptions are patches to core modules to let CPAN.pm upgrade core modules at all. (At least, that's what I think my logic was at the time.) Better suggestions welcome.
-xdg
Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.
| [reply] |
|
|
Better suggestions welcome
No, I don't have a better suggestion - though I would do it differently.
Normally, when one updates a core module on Win32, it goes into perl/lib, clobbering the old version in the process. I personally don't see any reason to change that behaviour.
Looking a little more closely at the Strawberry distro, we see there are still some MakeMaker modules in perl/lib/ExtUtils - eg EU::Liblist, which is duplicated in perl/site/lib/ExtUtils. (I think the duplicated modules are identical. One hopes so, as its the ones in perl/lib/ExtUtils that will be loaded.) If EU::MM is going into perl/site/lib then I think it would be a good idea to remove *all* of the MakeMaker modules from perl/lib/ExtUtils.
Anyway .... nothing to lose any sleep over. I was merely taken aback for a few minutes when I went to open MM_Win32.pm and it wasn't there !! :-)
Cheers, Rob
| [reply] |
|
|
I was merely taken aback for a few minutes when I went to open MM_Win32.pm and it wasn't there
perldoc -m ExtUtils::MM_Win32
This (along with "-l") is a handy feature of perldoc. I have $ENV{PAGER} set to "less.exe" and $ENV{EDITOR} set to "gvim.exe" so after the command above, I just type "v" and it pops me into the editor with the right file. It saves having to navigate directories.
-xdg
Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
Re: [Inconsequential] Strawberry Perl and MM_Win32.pm
by tye (Sage) on Jan 20, 2007 at 14:57 UTC
|
Because MM_Win32.pm v1.12 comes with Perl 5.8.8 but strawberryperl needs MM_Win32.pm v1.1201 which has portability improvements (likely made by the strawberryperl team).
| [reply] |
Re: [Inconsequential] Strawberry Perl and MM_Win32.pm
by CountZero (Bishop) on Jan 20, 2007 at 14:50 UTC
|
Did you install the MM_Win32.pm module yourself or did it came bundled with this version of Perl? In AS-Perl all bundled modules go to perl/lib and all modules installed later go into perl/site/lib.
CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law
| [reply] [d/l] [select] |
|
|
| [reply] |
|
|
That is not true anymore. In the latest version of AS Perl (version 5.8.8 build 819), the perl/site/lib starts out empty and gets filled by modules you install yourself (through CPAN / CPANPLUS or ppm).From the docs:There are two install areas that always are present for an ActivePerl installation: perl and site. The perl interpreter itself, the core modules, and packages bundled by ActiveState are in the perl install area. The site install area is where the local administrator installs additional packages. This area starts out empty in a new installation of ActivePerl.
CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [Inconsequential] Strawberry Perl and MM_Win32.pm
by jonadab (Parson) on Jan 20, 2007 at 14:17 UTC
|
The Strawberry Perl documentation does say that it is an alpha release, and that one of the implications of that is that not everything is necessarily installed in the ideal place, and that in future versions some things might get installed differently. Beyond that, there may not really be much of a reason.
Sanity? Oh, yeah, I've got all kinds of sanity. In fact, I've developed whole new kinds of sanity. You can just call me "Mister Sanity". Why, I've got so much sanity it's driving me crazy.
| [reply] |