Re: Use of uninitialized value

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Use of uninitialized value by Fletch (Bishop) on Feb 28, 2007 at 16:33 UTC
Erm . . . ouch. The quotes around `"$code[0]"` are superfluous, to start You could have just written it as `"$code[0].$code[1].$code[2]"` in one swell foop Of course that locks you in to a fixed number of elements; if you want to join an arbitrary number of items in `@code` then just use join: `$item = join( ".", @code );`	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^3: Use of uninitialized value by TGI (Parson) on Feb 28, 2007 at 19:00 UTC
If want a specific subset of elements, then you can use a slice: `my $item = join( ".", @code[0..2] ); my $not_item = join( ".", @code[9,7,0,3] );` [download] TGI says moo	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: Use of uninitialized value by andye (Curate) on Feb 28, 2007 at 16:45 UTC
Fletch, agreed that it's untidy as it is, but `$code[0].$code[1].$code[2] ne join( ".", @code )`. Best, andye Update: Anno is right, I did overlook a pair of quotes. Ignore me. :)	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: Use of uninitialized value by Anno (Deacon) on Feb 28, 2007 at 17:07 UTC
You overlooked a pair of quotes. Assuming that @code contains three elements, `"$code[0].$code[1].$code[2]"` is indeed the same as `join '.', @code`. Anno	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Use of uninitialized value by andye (Curate) on Feb 28, 2007 at 17:10 UTC
Re^6: Use of uninitialized value by blazar (Canon) on Mar 01, 2007 at 10:52 UTC
Re^2: Use of uninitialized value by andye (Curate) on Feb 28, 2007 at 16:27 UTC
One or more of `($code[0], $code[1], $code[2])` has nothing in it. Best, andye	[reply] [d/l]