Re^3: Use of uninitialized value

in reply to Re^2: Use of uninitialized value
in thread Use of uninitialized value

Fletch, agreed that it's untidy as it is, but $code[0].$code[1].$code[2] ne join( ".", @code ).

Best,

Update: Anno is right, I did overlook a pair of quotes. Ignore me. :)

Comment on Re^3: Use of uninitialized value Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Use of uninitialized value by Anno (Deacon) on Feb 28, 2007 at 17:07 UTC
You overlooked a pair of quotes. Assuming that @code contains three elements, `"$code[0].$code[1].$code[2]"` is indeed the same as `join '.', @code`. Anno	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^5: Use of uninitialized value by andye (Curate) on Feb 28, 2007 at 17:10 UTC
Did I? Surely if `@code = qw(foo bar baz)` then `$code[0].$code[1].$code[2] eq "foobarbaz"` whereas `(join '.', @code) eq "foo.bar.baz"` ? All the best, andye Update: You're completely right, I overlooked a pair of quotes. :)	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^6: Use of uninitialized value by blazar (Canon) on Mar 01, 2007 at 10:52 UTC
Update: You're completely right, I overlooked a pair of quotes. :) That is because the OP's code was so messy to begin with: one more reason to write it in a saner, more terse way!	[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom